Back in February, President
warned that the federal spending reductions included in the
sequester would deal a “huge blow to middle-class families and our
economy as a whole.” A month later, the $85 billion package of
budget trims kicked in. But as The Wall Street Journal
notes, today’s jobs report suggests that, at least so far, the
economy hasn’t exactly taken a beating as a result:
For months, economists have worried federal budget cutbacks —
the “sequester,” in Washington lingo — could weigh on the job
market and broader economy. Cutbacks kicked off March 1, but
furloughs of government workers began in April — and while those
furloughs don’t mean lost jobs, they could keep government
employers from hiring. Beyond government jobs, federal cutbacks
mean fewer government contracts for firms in the private-sector
like, say, those in the defense industry.
So far, though, the public and private job markets seem to be
holding their chins up.
Friday’s report showed the unemployment rate falling to 7.5%
from 7.6% and the economy adding an encouraging 165,000 jobs.
Figures for the previous two months were also revised up by 114,000
jobs. Retailers added 29,000 jobs, while the leisure and
hospitality industry (restaurants, for example) added 43,000. There
were also 31,000 new temp jobs, a sign that employers may add more
workers in the coming months but are straddling the fence, though
job growth in construction and manufacturing was snuffed out by bad
weather and global economic troubles, respectively.
That’s not an over-the-top amazing jobs report. But it’s not the
worst either, and certainly not the sort of doom-and-gloom the
president predicted before sequestration kicked in. No wonder,
then, that most Americans aren’t
particularly worried about its effects.
You can read the rest of this article at: http://reason.com/blog/2013/05/03/sequester-still-not-taking-the-predicted