Is Judicial Restraint the Proper Response to Judicial Activism?

Committed to Individual Liberty, Free Markets, and Peace

Cato on Facebook Cato on Facebook
Cato on Twitter Cato on Twitter
Google+ Cato on Google+
Cato on YouTube Cato on YouTube
Cato Mobile Cato Mobile
Cato RSS Cato RSS


Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20001-5403

workPhone (202) 842 0200
faxFax (202) 842 3490

Contact Us


Support Cato

PRINT PAGE


  Sans Serif




  Serif

Share with your friends:


BOOK FORUM
Thursday, November 1, 2012
Noon

Featuring J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; and Roger Pilon, Vice President for Legal Affairs, Cato Institute; moderated by Walter Olson, Senior Fellow, Cato Institute Center for Constitutional Studies.

The Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001

QuickTimeWatch the Event in QuickTime (M4V)
ipodDownload a Podcast of the Event (MP3)


Purchase Book
Does the climate of opinion among legal commentators improperly encourage judges to be “activist”? Or should judges be forthrightly active and vigorous about fulfilling their role in the Constitutional

You can read the rest of this article at: http://feeds.cato.org/~r/CatoEventPodcasts/~3/XmYKH34Tpcg/event.php

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>